4/15/2023 0 Comments Otixo san francisco![]() ![]() In the wake of Boudin’s disclosure, San Francisco Police implemented changes to the handling of victims’ DNA and were working on permanent policy changes in conjunction with the DA’s office and California’s Department of Justice, Chief Bill Scott said in March. “I am disturbed that victims who have the courage to undergo an invasive examination to help identify their perpetrators are being treated like criminals rather than supported as crime victims.” ![]() “Rapes and sexual assault are violent, dehumanizing, and traumatic,” Boudin said in a statement in February. He criticized the practice as “legally and ethically wrong” and said it could discourage rape and assault victims from coming forward. The lawsuit comes about seven months after then-San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin accused the police department’s crime lab of using a law enforcement database that includes DNA of rape and sexual assault victims. San Francisco rape controversy will have a chilling effect “The City is committed to ensuring all victims of crime feel comfortable reporting issues to law enforcement and has taken steps to safeguard victim information,” spokeswoman Jen Kwart said. San Francisco Police declined to comment, citing the pending lawsuit.Ī spokeswoman for the City Attorney’s Office issued a statement saying they will review the complaint and respond once served with the lawsuit. “Law enforcement officers test the victims’ DNA for matches in every subsequent criminal investigation in which genetic material is recovered without any reasonable basis to suspect the victims are in any way connected to these completely unrelated crime scenes.”Ĭivil rights attorney Adanté Pointer, who represents the plaintiff, said in a statement the case was a “clear example of government overreach.” “This case brings to light the San Francisco Police Department’s shocking practice of placing crime victims’ DNA into a permanent database without the victims’ knowledge or consent,” the lawsuit states. Doe argues in the lawsuit against the city and county and several police officials that the use of her DNA represented an unlawful search and seizure and violated her civil rights. The charges were later dropped, the suit states. SFPD sought an arrest warrant for Doe and relied on the DNA match in the warrant, and she was arrested and charged with several burglary-related offenses. In December 2021, an SFPD employee ran DNA from a burglary crime scene against the database and matched Doe to the crime, the lawsuit states. The San Francisco Police Department then, without her consent, put that DNA into a database and has for years tested it against crime scene DNA, according to the lawsuit. The woman, identified only as “Jane Doe,” alleges that law enforcement officers took her DNA in November 2016 as part of an investigation into her sexual assault. ![]() A sexual assault victim filed a federal lawsuit Monday alleging San Francisco Police violated her constitutional rights by relying on DNA taken from her rape kit years ago to arrest her in an unrelated burglary case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |